Child Protection Investigation Specialist (CPIS) Practice Exam

Which type of evidence supports a statement made previously by an individual?

1. Corroborating evidence

2. Inculpatory evidence

3. Circumstantial evidence

4. Testimonial evidence

The correct answer is: Corroborating evidence

Corroborating evidence is vital as it provides additional support to a statement or assertion made by an individual, strengthening its authenticity and credibility. This type of evidence complements and confirms prior claims, making it easier to establish the truth of those claims in a legal context. For instance, if a witness states they saw a crime occur, corroborating evidence might include surveillance footage capturing the same event or testimony from another witness who was present. By offering validation to the original statement, corroborating evidence plays a crucial role in investigations, particularly in child protection scenarios, where establishing the validity of claims is essential to ensuring the safety and well-being of children. The other options serve different functions in legal contexts. Inculpatory evidence tends to implicate an individual in wrongdoing, while circumstantial evidence, though often useful, infers a conclusion based on the surrounding circumstances rather than directly confirming a statement. Testimonial evidence refers more broadly to testimonies provided by witnesses, which may or may not be corroborated by additional evidence. Thus, corroborating evidence is specifically tailored to reinforce prior statements, making it the most appropriate choice in this context.